Page 1 of 1

12 Responses

  1. ckarath

    Nice article, but um I think DC is just going to throw another half dozen meaningless non-related event storylines at us. instead. k tx bai.

    ;)

  2. Sparky

    I’m just curious what’s on your pull list is like. Are you a spurned DC reader?

  3. Nick

    Blackest Night will be awesome, you’ll see!

    Ohshi

  4. Erik

    DC needs more heroes fighting heroes. I can’t get enough of that shit.

  5. Nick

    @Cory Ringdahl, How would a zombie Solomon Grundy speak?

    Like Oscar Wilde?

  6. Cobra Baghdad

    I think you’re missing the two bigger issues with the DCU, one internal and one external.

    The external one is simple. DC isn’t an independant company. They’re a fully owned subsidiary of AOL/Time/Warner. They are run by a conglomerate that wants to maximize issue sales. Crossover events increase issue sales in the short term. Major dramatic events increase issue sales in the short term. There are long term consequences of that, but once the long term costs outweigh everything, ATW can always sell off the intellectual properties and hard resources and walk away haviing made their money selling steaks off the cow.

    The internal issue is fundamental to most DC characters, and structural in nature. Their characters are all interesting only in terms of what they can do. Their weaknesses tend to be either minor, imaginary, or ridiculous. When the weaknesses become untenable to keep interesting, the weakness is eliminated. Superman is the iconic example. He’s indestructable except by kryptonite (an imaginary substabce not native to earth) which is rare and hard to come by except that Lex Luthor seems to have a deal to buy it by the ton and any villian who wants to be a real threat has to have access to some.

    When I compare this to Spiderman, for example, who has a moral crusade that makes it hard for him to build a relationship, hold down a job, or pay his rent, it’s easy for me to spot the weakness with with I can relate.

    Green arrow sleeps around and is kind of a jerk, That’s not a superhero weakness, it’s a character quirk. The only deeply interesting character on an emotional level among the front line DC characters is Batman, and even then he’s not really capped to the limitations of a normal person, but he comes close. The biggest difference between the DCU and the MU (and the IU and DHU to lesser extents) is that DCU characters are defined by what they can do. MU characters are defined by what they can’t.

  7. Matt Schuster

    Nice rant. I haven’t bought a DC comic or GN in months, nothing appeals to me anymore.

  8. Erika Szabo

    I don’t want to be a buzzkill or anything, but according to the end of Final Crisis #7, Batman is alive and well. This is no surprise for two reasons:

    1. Who really dies in the DCU?
    and
    2. The Omega Sanction (which supposedly killed Batman in FC#6) merely traps the organism in a series of alternate realities, each worse than the previous one.

    With this in mind, seeing Batman stuck at the beginning of time, watching Anthro pass away while he scratches his bat symbol on the wall, is really more of an answer (or rather connection) to the beginning of FC – by this, I mean the same cave drawings Bruce Wayne is working on in the final page.

    But this is beside the point.

    I really appreciated reading this rant, because you are completely right on so many aspects. I don’t think we can completely blame Dan DaDio for all of the most recent issues, but I feel as though he has swayed the DCU in a direction few of us want, or rather, need.

    I can’t say I read as much DC anymore (I’m actually veering towards the Vertigo band wagon). Probably because everything in the DCU seems so superficial.

    And I’ve got to say, I loved BOOSTER_GOLD!!!. Practically sweating in desperation.

Leave a Reply