rulururu

post Amazing Spider-Man #618 — Have you ever played Twister?

January 26th, 2010 -- mini-url

Filed under: Review, marvelMike Rapin @ 4:29 pm
Amazing Spider-Man #618 cover

Mysterio! The Gauntlet! Dan Slott! Oh my!

After not reading comics for almost two months, I finally went and picked up all of the comics I hadn’t bought and in this monstrous stack was Amazing Spider-Man #618. Penned by Dan Slott with art by Marcos Martin, this was the issue I have been looking forward to for months (since I heard word of it back in August) that was apart of Spider-Man’s “The Gauntlet.”

In case you haven’t been keeping up with Amazing Spider-Man, what’s been happening is this: all of Spidey’s old villains have been coming back… with a vengeance. The thing is, they’re not coming back to get Spider-Man, but they’re coming back to do what they do best: do selfish things. So far, we’ve had Electro, Sandman, Rhino (2.0) and this weeks baddy–Mysterio.

It’s been all very good so far, but this week’s issue… I wasn’t feeling it so much, which is a huge surprise since I have an absolute love for Dan Slott’s Spider-Man. But let’s talk more after the break.

*some minor spoilery after the break*

As I said, I was very excited for this issue. Mysterio’s coming back. Who couldn’t be excited for that?

Well, let me first just say that this issue was all over the place. We had ties in to Mr. Negative, the Maggia mafia family, Aunt May and J. Jonah Sr., cyborgs, and all sorts of crazy things. Could this be the intention of the author? Perhaps. Is Mr. Slott trying to mess with us only to build to a bigger picture? Perhaps.

A cyborg? In a Spider-Man book?

A cyborg? In a Spider-Man book?

Nevertheless, it was nearly confusing how off the wall some of these twists in the story were. First of all, I’m not a fan of this whole “Aunt May and JJJ Sr. are back, oh wait they’re not” plot point that some of the authors have been using. It’s really random and sometimes pointless. Dan Slott used it to further the story, but it felt really out of the blue to me and could have been left for another story arc.

But without giving away much more story, I will say I am interested to see where this all goes. The one thing I will say is that the twists and turns of the story weren’t so random that it didn’t make sense (see: Batman & Robin #4) and the whole tie together with Mysterio adds some subtle explanation as to what may be going on with pretty much everything–which is probably the best feature of writing with Mysterio involved.

The only serious issue I have with this issue is that there is too much going on. This isn’t an issue an old fan of Spider-Man can just pick up on a whim to get back in the game. Yes, the pre-text to the issue helps explain something of what’s going on, but as of this week, I’m not sure how this all ties together. My guess is that a person who would pick up this issue because of the cover wouldn’t get what’s going either and won’t get the next issue.

Of course, I’ll be keeping up with this series because it’s Spider-Man and Dan Slott and you really can’t go wrong, but we’ll see… we’ll see.

Oh, and there was this thing that happened with Martin Li...

Oh, and there was this thing that happened with Martin Li...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments »

  1. Yeah, this issue was sortoff all over the place. The previous gauntlets have been less reliant on the current spidey cast (Mr. Negative, Hammerhead, JJJ Sr. Etc.) which made these one less accessible to casual spider-man fans. It did feel firmly planted in the current universe, but it was sortoff all over the place.

    I’m interested in seeing where Mysterio fits in. As of now, I have no idea.

    Reply

    Comment by Marcus Enriquez — January 26, 2010 @ 9:01 pm

  2. hehe, I said “Thees one” like I’m Triumph the insult comic dog or something, lol.

    Reply

    Comment by Marcus Enriquez — January 26, 2010 @ 9:02 pm

  3. Mysterio should have stayed dead. Now im not saying heroes/villians should never rise from the dead or be revealed to never have died in the first place, but Kevin Smith wrote one of the best deaths (IMHO) in the last 20 years. He spent months building up the storyline only to reveal the man behind the whole thing was a cancer bearing Mysterio. In that moment Mysterio went from hanging with Kathy Griffen on the D List straight to the top similiar to what Geoff Johns did with the Flashs Rogues Gallery. Then he decides to send him off with a bang, literally. His death had such an impact on me, only to be cheapened months later when he returns. I just dont see the need for it sometimes. If a character was killed prematurely or for no reason, fine, by all means bring him back. But if it was awesome and its something everyone will always remember, then theyre just better off dead.

    Reply

    Mike Rapin Reply:

    I totally understand. I get what Marvel is trying to do here with all of the Spider-Man villains coming back, but when we look back in 10 years are we really going to be proud of what happened? Are we really going to be glad to say “Man, when Mysterio came back it changed everything.” No, we won’t. We’ll be saying, “Oh, yeah, that was when Marvel had no better ideas than to bring back old/dead villains for no particular reason.”

    But what can we do? I keep buying. You keep buying. So they keep writing.

    Reply

    Comment by Joey Soup — January 28, 2010 @ 1:00 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

ruldrurd